Wake School Facts
Links to relevant news articles on school assignment.
  • Fraud Found in Lunch Programs (July 2008) - Discusses fraud found in applications for F&R programs. In other words, the data Wake County is using to determine who to bus is extremely suspect.
  • Speaking the right language on education (July 2, 2008) - Discusses programs being undertaken in Charlotte to help improve education for poor students and English as a Second Language students. Note that they do not involve busing, but rather programs targeted to help these children directly...
  • Students in Clayton concerned, Student wants to see if Obama can help Clayton schools, Police escort board member out amid cheers, SACS Report on Clayton schools  (June 2008) - A series of articles on a Georgia school district facing loss of accreditation and a parent revolt thanks to a focus on things other than education. If you don't think the same thing can happen here, you need to read the last Curriculum Audit performed on Wake County (fall of 2007) to see how much the focus on educating children has been lost.
  • Wake Diversity Busing Plan Runs Up Against Diesel Costs (June 2008) - See page 11 of this edition of the Carolina Journal for a discussion of Wake County's busing program and the rising costs of fuel.
  • States Grapple With Fuel Costs for School Buses (May 30, 2008) - An AP article listing some of the ways education is being cut to pay for rising fuel costs for busing.
  • County Power Hems In School Board (May 22, 2008) - Turns out the Wake County Commissioners have more authority than they thought they did to dictate HOW the school board spends the money they give them.
  • Held Back In School 25 Years (April 26, 2008) - An opinion piece from George Will with some interesting data on how public school performance has declined since the Federal Government got involved and major reforms started happening in how we educate our children. Talks about reports showing that family involvement is more important than money when educating children, and lists many of the failed educational experiments that have used our children as guinea pigs.
  • Transportation Costs: An Eye Opener (April 15, 2008) - Another Blog post with data on how much more is being spent on transportation and busing than in past years.
  • Soaring Fuel Prices Hurts Kids (April 10, 2008) - A CNN/Money article on how soaring fuel prices are forcing districts to cut back basic educational programs to continue meeting busing needs. Again, we could better use the money we spend on busing F&R kids around the county to improve the schools close to their homes.
  • Editorial in Favor of At-Large Elections (April 8, 2008) - An editorial making the case for at-large elections of school board members, pointing out how inefficiently the current district-based scheme works.
  • A Rebuttal to the Wake Education Partnership (April 1, 2008) - On February 14, 2008, the Wake Education Partnership released a brochure entitled "Striking a Balance: In Support of Diversity in the Wake County Public School System" that attempted to provide evidence supporting Wake County's diversity busing program. This rebuttal refutes many of the points in that brochure, including the claims that we have "excellent schools" as a result, and it brings quite the pile of facts to back itself up (as opposed to many of the twisted numbers WCPSS tries to present in its favor).
  • Followup Comments on Joint Meeting (March 27, 2008) - A Blog post from Save Our Students, interesting for its analysis of the polls that Wake County loves to use to prove support for Mandatory Year Round and bond issues.
  • Wake 2008 Magnet / Calendar Applications (March 12, 2008) - As you read this, the question you should be asking is "if year-round schools are the solution to our capacity woes, and MANDATORY year-round is such a hotly debated topic, how could they only find seats for HALF the people who WANTED a year-round seat?" You should also keep in mind that the way they found room for all the traditional opt-outs was by ripping kids out of those seats and sending them elsewhere. For example, students in nodes 371.2 and 371.3 were pulled out of Weatherstone to make room for traditional opt-outs. This was the third move in the last 8 years for some of these families. And for those moved to new year-round schools, their traditional opt-out was NOT the school they were just assigned out of.
  • Inspiring Parents; Educating Youth (Spring 2008) - From the University of Minnesota, talks about the Learning Dreams program which works to foster parental involvement in the education of their children. The pilot project was done in a housing project and resulted in huge educational gains for these economically disadvantaged children. This shows that their are alternatives to busing if your primary goal is education the children, AND that parental involvement is key, something that is made more difficult by busing children across the county.
  • Closer to "home" (2008) - From the Oregon School Boards Association, talks about a school built on a smaller land footprint so it can be built in a neighborhood, reducing transportation costs in their fast-growing community and allow easier use of the school facilities (such as the playground) after-hours.
  • Pollution Lowers IQ (February 15, 2008) - Talks about how kids that are exposed to high levels of traffic pollution tend to have lower IQs. When you read it, think about the hour-long bus rides Wake County likes to send kids on.
  • Wichita Busing Ended (January 2008) - Wichita school systems stop busing for desegregation, and impose a limit on how far students can be bused to a school.
  • Case for Busing Blows a Tire (November 14, 2007) - Shows that poor students in Charlotte, where forced busing has been eliminated, are performing at the same level as poor students in Wake County, indicating that forced busing is not having a positive impact on education after all.
  • Sending Poor Kids to Middle-Class Schools Doesn't Fix the System (October 3, 2007) - An article examining various school systems that have tried busing poor kids to middle-class schools and how they all failed to meet the goal of improving educational opportunities for all.
  • Integration Boosts Low-Income Kids, but... (September 19, 2007) - An article that discusses how family involvement is a much larger factor in the education of high-poverty students than where they attend school.
  • There They Go Again (July 24, 2007) - Discusses Wake County's socio-economic busing scheme and shows that despite Wake County's claims of success, test scores in the state as a whole improved about the same (in some cases) more than in Wake County, pointing to state factors rather than county factors in the improvement.
  • Learning from Nine High Poverty, High Achieving Blue Ribbon Schools (June 2007) - Discusses the characteristics that make for a successful high poverty school.
  • Family Involvement in School and Low-Income Children's Literacy Performance (January 2007) - Research showing a link between family involvement and literacy in low-income students.
  • Illiterates Everywhere! (September 26, 2005) - Pokes holes in the "improving test scores" claim made by WCPSS and re-iterated in a New York Times piece (available here). These numbers and this article are often used as part of the "proof" that F&R busing works.
  • Mapping 2005 State Proficiency Scores (June 2007) - This document normalizes reported state test scores. Under No Child Left Behind, states have some freedom in determining what tests to use and how to grade them to determine proficiency. This document smooths those out to offer direct comparisons between states. It shows that North Carolina is one of the worst for using this freedom to deceive its citizens about how students are doing on their proficiency tests.
  • Key Lessons: High-Performing, High-Poverty Schools (August 19, 2005) - Summarizes experiences of various school systems in improving education in high poverty schools. A good read for how to FIX the schools we have that are underperforming, rather than hiding the problem by busing kids all over the county.
  • High Performance in High Poverty Schools (2003) - Another good read on what WORKS in improving education in high poverty environments.
  • Wake County Schools: A Question of Balance (September 19, 2002) - An excellent read on the history of the F&R policy in Wake County, with lots of citations and comments from people on both sides of the issue. Still very relevant and discusses many of the same issues being discussed today.
  • Parental Involvement Under the New Title I & Title III: From Compliance to Effective Practice (2002) - Discusses the importance of not only having parents participate in the education of their children, but of also having them as informed and empowered decisionmakers.
  • A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family, and Community Connections on Student Achievement (2002) - You have to pay to get the full document, but the synopsis on the page is a synthesis of 51 studies that examine how important family and community is in education and recommendations for improving family and community involvement.
  • Parent Involvement in Education (2001) - Discusses parental involvement in education with lots of additional references on the topic.
  • Leading an Inner City School to "Overall Excellence" (August 2001) - Discusses success at Seattle's Thurgood Marshall Elementary School, a largely poor urban school, without involving busing.
  • Families on the Move (January 2001) - Researches the affects of stability on a child's education, showing that children who move a lot have a harder time in school.
  • The Impact of Poverty Upon Schools (March 1999) - WCPSS' collection of research on the topic. It's all of 3 pages, has only 1 page of citations, and hasn't been updated since 1999.